Countries have been forced to take a stand and make a decision on whether or not to involve themselves in Syria's affairs. Although nearly every country has an opinion on the use of chemical weapons in Syria, that is where the similarities end. Every country has its own perspective.

The Americans

The United States backed itself into a corner more than any other country. After President Obama's "red line" comment claiming the United States would not allow chemical warfare, it seemed as if the United States would have a clear justification for getting involved in the Syrian civil war. However, in an attempt to unify the nation, Obama decided he would not authorize any military strikes without Congress' approval, far from a given for Obama.

Libertarian leaning Republicans such as Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., and Rep. Justin Amash, R-Mich., showed severe caution regarding American intervention in Syria. Even if Obama garners enough congressional support, this authorization could not come for at least another 10 days.

The British

Obama's worst nightmare has been a reality for British Prime Minister David Cameron. Parliament voted Thursday against Cameron's wishes and blocked British intervention in Syria. Much like in the United States, a sizeable majority of the population vehemently opposed British intervention.

The international community sa that this is a pivotal moment in a British decline from a powerful country to an isolated one. With Great Britain unwilling to take a stand against the very use of chemical weapons that they had previously denounced, this may prove to severely tatter Britain's legitimacy.

The French

France finds itself in a state much like the United States. President Francois Hollande opted to await a decision from his parliament. France has been the most vocal, unwavering country in asserting its commitment in engaging in military strikes. Regardless of French parliament's decision, Hollande has the legal power to authorize military strikes.

By showing a willingness to join the United States in military strikes, the French put themselves in a position to chip at the British-American relationship and nudge themselves into an even closer partnership with the United States.

The Russians

Russia, on the other hand, has taken a position that will only further erode its relationship with the United States. Russia defended its ally, Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, and denounced any intervention. Russian President Vladamir Putin challenged the United States to show evidence of nuclear attacks and said the notion Syria would use chemical weapons was "utter nonsense." Russia might be the country most firm in its response to the Syrian controversy. Its response being inactivity.

The Iranians

Also on Russia's side is Iran. Iranian leaders showed support for the Syrian regime, with their Chief of Staff General Firouzabadi warning the United States against intervention in Syria or else it would result in an attack on Israel. Iran's threats haven't stopped at Israel, with other countries in the Middle East fearing backlash.

The Middle East

Israel activated its "Iron Dome" missile defense system, illustrating its fear the Syrian controversy would result in an attack on its soil. Due to Israel's position as a steady U.S. ally and its close proximity to both Syria and Iran, the country is an easy target for retaliation. 

Also fearing their safety, both Saudi Arabia and Qatar were hesitant to declare support for a military strike. Despite both countries' desire to oust Assad, they fear outright support for military action because both Iran and Syria have threatened to attack those nations that support a military strike. 

Both Iraq and Jordan put their forces in a state of emergency due to the flood of Syrian refugees into their borders. They also fear retaliation should military strikes be authorized. In Jordan, there was a fear an attack on Syria would be an attack on the safety and well-being of Jordan. 

Turkey, which shares a long border with Syria, has been less fearless. They encouraged western involvement and allowed the Syrian rebels to use its territory to organize their attacks against the Syrian government.

Although far from fair, it is undeniable the decisions of the United States and France regarding military strikes will impact countries that are closer to Syria, such as Israel, Jordan and Turkey. Until French Parliament and U.S. Congress make a decision, the Middle East will be on ice, just waiting for the strike to crack.

Reach staff reporter Nick Thomas here.