warning Hi, we've moved to USCANNENBERGMEDIA.COM. Visit us there!

Neon Tommy - Annenberg digital news

Schwarzenegger Leads Public Forum On Climate Change

Edward Loera |
April 8, 2013 | 8:58 p.m. PDT

Staff Reporter

(Edward Loera, Neon Tommy)
(Edward Loera, Neon Tommy)
The USC Schwarzenegger Institute for State and Global Policy, housed under the USC Price School of Public Policy, held a public comment forum for the federally mandated National Climate Assessment draft. This forum featured distinguished scientists and public policy officials, including former Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, who all spoke on the need to address climate change.

Created by the former governor himself, the USC Schwarzenegger Institute commits itself to advancing post-partisanship in order to find the best ideas and solutions for the people. With Schwarzenegger being a big advocate for addressing climate change, this institute prides itself on advancing energy and the environment in public policy.

The former governor commenced the forum with a few opening remarks. Schwarzenegger spoke mainly on the need for the public to heed scientists' warnings about the environment before the consequences of climate change become too serious. Comparing the acceptance of climate change to a doctor’s warning about health, Schwarzenegger told the audience, “I am as eager to hear the findings about this assessment as I am to hear the findings of my physical.”

Hilda Blonco, the director of the USC Center for Sustainable Cities, then introduced the main findings of the environmental assessment. According to the report, the southwest region of the U.S. has five distinct issues, the first being that there has been a decline in snowpack and streamflow amounts.

Under federal law, distinct regions of the United States must provide periodic assessments on how a particular region is affected by climate change. Coordinated by the National Climate Assessment (NCA), a group of nearly 240 scientists and experts prepared a comprehensive report detailing how climate change will affect the southwestern part of the United States.

The assessment detailed the impact of climate change on irrigation in the southwest, an increase in the amount of drought and warming, an increase in flooding and erosion occurring in the costal regions of California, as well as projected temperature increases.

After the initial messages, several scientists presented their research that was incorporated into the draft of the climate assessment report.

Phillip Duffy, who works for the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, spoke on the use of advanced modeling in scientific projections on climate change. Duffy made the point that, although there are a number of uncertainties that come with climate change data, we should not fear the data.

“We need to learn to work with uncertainty,” said Duffy

Other experts, such as Tom Swetnam, spoke about the increase in the number and intensity of forest fires, while David Pierce spoke about Southern California’s stretched water resources, which will become even scarcer as California becomes a drier region. Rupa Basu also presented her evidence on an increase in heat correlating to an increase in mortality, and Matthew Heberger talked about the dangers in rising sea levels pose to the costal regions of the United States.

Although much of the evidence presented by the scientist presented some bleak outcomes for the southwest if the climate continues to heat up, the panel seemed to agree on the idea that policy intervention could help manage the current effects of climate change and prevent the projected catastrophic effects.

In addition to this panel of judges, several public commentators from a wide variety of industries and organizations also offered their comments on the need for climate change prevention. One particularly popular idea amongst the commentators was made by Dan Jacobson, who said that “reducing global warming does not have to be counter to our economy.”

This was then followed by a short question and answer period by the crowd. When the panel was asked about how scientist were going to compete with the exorbitant amount of corporate money spent against them, Governor Schwarzenegger stepped forward and talked about how Californians supported the climate change laws in California, even though they felt a great deal of opposition from corporate interests.

In an op-ed in the Los Angeles Times, Schwarzenegger expressed similar ideas to the ones expressed in the forum.

“The first step for policymakers — and for ordinary citizens too — is to understand the situation we face…the knowledge in this report is crucial to understanding how to change, to adapt, to prevent and to prepare for future disasters” said the former governor.

The draft of the climate assessment for the southwest region is up for public review until Friday. Following a period of revision and review by the White House and federal agencies, the final version of the National Climate Assessment will be provided to the President and Congress by early 2014.

Reach Staff Reporter Edward Loera here and follow him on Twitter here


Live On Twitter


Craig Gillespie directed this true story about "the most daring rescue mission in the history of the U.S. Coast Guard.”

Watch USC Annenberg Media's live State of the Union recap and analysis here.



Babu G. Ranganathan (not verified) on April 10, 2013 7:26 AM


Dr. Larry Vardiman (scientist and physicist) of the Institue for Creation Research says:

"One possible scenario may be found in a recent series of articles by Henrik Svensmark and Nigel Marsh, cosmic ray specialists from Denmark, who have shown an indirect connection between galactic cosmic ray (GCR) intensity and global temperature.7,8,9 They are studying the influence of the Sun on the flow of GCR to Earth. The Sun's changing sunspot activity influences the magnetosphere surrounding the Earth permitting more GCR to strike the Earth during high periods of activity.

When the Sun is active, the intensity of GCR striking the Earth is increased, causing more ionization in the atmosphere, creating more carbon-14, and possibly creating more cloud condensation nuclei (CCN). This increase in CCN, in turn, appears to create more low-level clouds which cool the Earth. When the Sun is quiet the GCR intensity striking the Earth is reduced, allowing the Earth to warm. Svensmark and Marsh have shown a striking statistical correlation between sunspot activity and global cooling and warming over the past 1000 years.

The recent rise in global temperature may partially be due to current low solar activity supplemented by a recent increase in carbon dioxide concentration measured at Mauna Loa. The connection which still needs further study is the production of CCN and clouds by GCR."

There is a good deal of science showing that global warming is not mad made. Yes, we still should have pollution controls, as we already do, but not to the extreme because it will unnecessarily hurt business.

Visit my newest Internet site: THE SCIENCE SUPPORTING CREATION

Babu G. Ranganathan
B.A. Bible/Biology