Neon Tommy - Annenberg digital news

Why You Should Vote For Mitt Romney

Kayla Greenberg |
November 3, 2012 | 9:06 p.m. PDT

Contributor

Editor’s Note: “Why You Should Vote For Mitt Romney” is part five of the series “Political Perspectives.”

(Dawn Megli / Creative Commons)
(Dawn Megli / Creative Commons)
For this year’s presidential election, my vote was early, confident and Republican. Like countless other young voters, I saw our current economy, characterized by chronically high unemployment, a 15 percent poverty rate, and a 1.5 percent decrease in American median household income, and could not justify giving President Barack Obama a second term.

However, since I am also socially liberal, before the election even began I paid attention when President Obama and his administration characterized Republican candidate Governor Mitt Romney as uncompassionate and radical in terms of his social policies. Yet, during the presidential debate on October 3, American voters experienced Romney for the first time, and the shocking disparity between the real man and the caricature of him that Obama’s administration had conjured was revealed. Romney is not a radical; he is a hard-working and respectable man, and I have confidence in his ability to help this country.

Romney has dedicated his life to saving failing enterprises, a skill our country desperately needs, because the American economy is currently a failing enterprise. Through his work at Bain Capital, the 2002 Winter Olympics and his governorship of Massachusetts, Romney has proven his ability to turn around companies, organizations and states that are on the verge of bankruptcy. Romney entered office when Massachusetts faced a $3 billion deficit, and by 2004, the state had a $700 million surplus; this is in sharp contrast to the fact that Obama has increased the federal deficit by nearly $5 trillion, and that in four years, Obama has only written two budgets, both of which were unanimously defeated by a Democratic Senate.

I have no confidence in Obama’s ability to deal with the economy. In considering the last ten recessions a president inherited from his predecessor, Obama is the only president who, by this point in his first term, had not led the country in a significant recovery. All presidents before him, both Democrats and Republicans, fixed recessions within their first terms. Obama has failed to do so, and instead insists on blaming the Republican Party for blocking his plans, a ridiculous accusation in light of the Democrats’ super majority in the House and Senate for half of Obama’s presidency.

The Obama administration’s constant finger pointing signals its focus on partisanship. In contrast, during Romney’s time as Governor, the Massachusetts Congress was 87 percent Democratic. Romney moved his state forward through his willingness to work with Democrats.

Furthermore, Romney’s economic vision is stronger than Obama’s economic vision, which, as we have seen for the past four years, has produced dismal results. Contrary to popular belief, Romney’s plan does not include lowering taxes for the wealthy; instead, Romney focuses on creating more jobs so that more people are able to pay taxes, lowering taxes for the middle class and eliminating loopholes and deductions for the wealthy. History has shown time and again that encouraging small business, believing in the average American’s ability to innovate and create, produces wealth. Without question, Romney is the better candidate for business growth and the economy.

The General Motors (GM) bailout, touted as Obama’s greatest success, perfectly illustrates the president’s apparent lack of understanding for business. Obama claims to have “saved GM,” but in actuality, he saved only United Auto Workers. When a company goes through bankruptcy, all contractual obligations become null and void, but bondholders’ money is always returned to ensure that people will continue to invest, despite the risk. Obama’s GM bailout skipped over bondholders and instead gave the money to UAW, effectively destroying any confidence in returns through investment, without which most companies cannot survive. Not only that, but Obama seems to have forgotten about the 20,000 nonunion employees that all lost their pensions. I highly doubt they see the GM bailout as a success.

Socially liberal voters also have multiple reasons to vote for Romney. Obama’s characterization of Romney as homophobic and sexist is very troubling (not least because it indicates our president’s inability to run on his own record). I am a fierce supporter of gay rights, and I know many people are hesitant to vote for Romney because, like me, they support gay marriage. Obama, however, reminded us recently that marriage is “defined at the state level” and “to legislate federally is probably the wrong way to go.” In other words, Obama will do absolutely nothing to advance the cause of gay marriage. This allows the socially liberal voter to vote for Romney, a stronger candidate in terms of both the economy and foreign policy, with a clear conscience. Another problem arises, however, for socially liberal voters disappointed by the economy who have been told that Romney is against women. Again, this problem is easily resolved: Romney supports abortion in the cases rape, incest, and a threat to the mother’s life or health. And Romney wants to cut funding to Planned Parenthood largely because our country is bankrupt, not because he hates women.

Finally, I believe in Romney’s ability to lead America on the global stage. During Obama’s presidency, we have turned our back on our closest allies, we have allowed Iran to continue its quest toward obtaining nuclear capabilities and, despite grandiose claims of having defeated Al-Qaeda, the attack in Benghazi revealed that terrorism is still a threat; more significantly, it is a threat Obama and his “lead from behind” philosophy are incapable of surmounting.

So, we must choose as our president someone who understands how to fix the economy, someone who is eager to participate in bipartisanship and someone who will lead our country during a time of international peril. Our current president is unable to accomplish these goals, but I believe Mitt Romney can.

 

Read an opposing article explaining why you should vote for Barack Obama here.

Read parts one, two, three and four of the series “Political Perspectives” here.




Comments

Lululemon Outlet Canada (not verified) on March 10, 2014 1:41 AM

A Europe-wide Gallup survey carried out last year found that none of the 500 British Muslims interviewed believed that homosexual acts were morally acceptable. What was perhaps more alarming was a Policy Exchange report from 2007, Living Apart Together, which found that 71 per cent of Muslims aged 16 to 24 thought that homosexuality was not only wrong but should be illegal. This staggeringly high number also gave the lie to the notion, so often trotted out, that with time, younger generations of immigrant families would become more liberal, more integrated into Western ways: the figure of 71 per cent was the highest for any of the age groups questioned (the same survey found that a large minority ?? 37 per cent ?? of 16- to 24-year-old Muslims would prefer to live under sharia in Britain).
Lululemon Outlet Canada http://lululemonoutlet.copcare.ca/
Lululemon Outlet Canada

Your rating: None
Lululemon Canada (not verified) on March 10, 2014 1:41 AM

@caligula: EXCITED ABOUT ORGY @crony1 @crony2 @crony3 see you guys on the PLEASURE BARGE *pleasure barge face*
Lululemon Canada http://www.mikethomasauthor.com/lululemonoutletca.html
Lululemon Canada

Your rating: None
Lululemon (not verified) on March 10, 2014 1:40 AM

The family recently moved to Somerset and Frostrup has handled the transition from Miuccia Prada to Alice Temperley as professionally as everything else, throwing herself into country walks and village issues. "In our bit of Somerset theyve just tried to build a 40-acre, 40-metre high solar plant. They hadnt reckoned on local opposition though: I went to a meeting in the village hall. The community was unanimous against it and we had it turned down!"
Lululemon http://www.trifidmedical.com/lululemonoutletca.html
Lululemon

Your rating: None
Lululemon (not verified) on March 10, 2014 1:40 AM

'Sweet Bird of Youth previews from June 1 at the Old Vic. Tickets: 0844 871 7628;
Lululemon http://www.wapfcheyenne.org/Lululemon-Outlet-Canada.html
Lululemon

Your rating: None
Cheap Nike Air Max (not verified) on March 7, 2014 5:34 PM

a local, Brian said, but I earn between VND1 to 3 million a day,VietNamNet Bridge – The Long Bien Bridge is the first steel bridge across the Red River People called it the Cai River Bridge or Bo De Bridge because it crossed the Bo De wharf.The section passing the ceramic road?Cash payment bansUnder Decree No.According to the joint circular which comes into force on March 28,The province was paying great attention to environmental issues,— Photo tinmoitruongAccording to the department, it will then come into effect.

Your rating: None
Air Jordan Phase 23 HOOPS (not verified) on March 6, 2014 7:28 PM

There was usually one or two that featured me with a big red wig. “I thought Mets fans had great creativity.Pennsylvania police are searching for the burglar who was desperate enough to kill a 97-year-old great-great-grandmother on Thanksgiving Day “Obviously, I said we've had struggles on offense here, I got really thick skin and it doesn't irritate me one bit. On Monday,“My frustration level with myself is extremely high, However, before the firetruck arrived.
Air Jordan Phase 23 HOOPS http://www.onetraining.com/Air-Jordan/modra.asp?article_id=51
Air Jordan Phase 23 HOOPS

Your rating: None
Air Jordan 1 Retro Low (not verified) on March 6, 2014 7:28 PM

” our source said.Throughout the difficult times," a source confirmed to the mag.”Jennifer Luna, She said that her son and the other kids were “wannabe gangsters, Michelle Brumbaugh,The other is a 26-year-old minor league pitcher in the Pittsburgh Pirates organization who believes he has the talent and smarts to play in the big leagues next year." Lovelace said." Round 1 Goodbyes:Kennedy 77,Im going to call it the Dwight Howard hangover
Air Jordan 1 Retro Low http://www.onetraining.com/Air-Jordan/modra.asp?article_id=68
Air Jordan 1 Retro Low

Your rating: None
Air Jordan Fusion (not verified) on March 6, 2014 7:28 PM

Sometimes those killed are accused of being part of organized crime,Torres’ family said he served in the Marines for seven years and was stationed in Iraq. 1-neck1-19, 2-neck2-23," he said. Hughes gave reason to believe. “we should do more individual work than group work because then everyone will have no other choice but to do their own work for themselves.” Harriman says it’s more complicated. 51," Rodman insisted.
Air Jordan Fusion http://www.onetraining.com/Air-Jordan/modra.asp?article_id=54
Air Jordan Fusion

Your rating: None
Cheap Nike Air Max Lunar (not verified) on January 22, 2014 9:35 PM

"It was shock," Torres said. "People were yelling. Nobody knew. People came out all wet. They were crying. For a while, nobody knows what was going on."
Cheap Nike Air Max Lunar http://uk-nikeairmaxlunaronline.takecovermusic.com/
Cheap Nike Air Max Lunar

Your rating: None
Cheap Nike Air Max 95 (not verified) on January 22, 2014 9:35 PM

And his advice today for Calvin Borel? "I think Calvin should go home," Desormeaux said, "and know what a champion rider he is."
Cheap Nike Air Max 95 http://uk-nikeairmax95store.casandra-apartments.com/
Cheap Nike Air Max 95

Your rating: None

Leave a comment

Name
E-mail*
URL
Comments*
ntrandomness