warning Hi, we've moved to USCANNENBERGMEDIA.COM. Visit us there!

Neon Tommy - Annenberg digital news

Immigration Reform Shouldn't Be About Winning Elections

Christian Patterson |
November 21, 2012 | 9:34 a.m. PST


Right now it seems as if politicians are using immigration reform to obtain votes. (Boss Tweed, Creative Commons)
Right now it seems as if politicians are using immigration reform to obtain votes. (Boss Tweed, Creative Commons)
There has been a great deal of talk about immigration reform in the wake of Mitt Romney’s defeat earlier this month. Conservative leaders from Sean Hannity to Charles Krauthammer to Marco Rubio have initiated a conversation on how the Republican Party can push its own form of comprehensive federal immigration reform.

Our immigration system is obviously broken. The process for those who wish to come into this country legally is cumbersome, expensive and often drags on for years. There are thousands of Dreamers – young people who were brought into the U.S. illegally at a very early age, never having known their home country – who face limited opportunities, an uncertain future and the very real possibility that they will be sent back to a nation they aren't familiar with. And these issues only scratch the surface of the problem, considering that there are an estimated 11.5 million undocumented immigrants in this country, and that we have been unable to secure our border to ensure that we know who crosses it.

The need for immigration reform is evident, and in any other climate the GOP would have been praised for taking up an issue of such importance to so many Americans. The problem is that this isn’t any other climate. Many of the Republican leaders who are championing reform are only doing so in order to win future elections. How do we know this? Well, because they’ve told us so.

When Sean Hannity changed his tune on immigration reform, he didn’t speak of his compassion for millions of Dreamers who desperately need it. His rationale was: “we’ve got to get rid of the immigration issue altogether” in order for the GOP to continue to compete. Krauthammer’s call for amnesty was coupled with the acknowledgement that he’d always been of the “enforcement first” school, but that amnesty is what the Republican party needs to push in order to beat Democrats.

When Romney asserted that he lost the election because Obama offered gifts to blacks and Latinos, Bobby Jindal, the Republican governor of Louisiana (and probable 2016 hopeful), said: “we as a Republican Party have to campaign for every single vote. We don’t start winning majorities...by insulting our voters.” That’s not a condemnation of Romney for saying that minorities are lazy and want stuff. That’s a “shhh...we’re never going to win if they know we think that.”

No one is saying that all Republicans care only about immigration reform for the purpose of winning elections. Jeb Bush and Marco Rubio, two prominent Floridian politicians, have called for a change in GOP strategy on immigration throughout this election season. But the vast majority of the Republican party has not, and the comments of some of their most prominent commentators, thinkers and elected officials demonstrates that this change of heart is not wholly altruistic.

I’m happy that immigration reform is finally being brought to the forefront of the national debate. I’m ecstatic that we’re no longer talking about “electric fences” and making life so miserable for immigrants that people have to leave. I just wish the debate was actually about the people who are suffering the consequences of Washington’s failure to act, rather than about winning electoral majorities. I fear that reform based on political gamesmanship won’t yield the type of discussion (and ultimately legislation) that will really solve the immigration problem that confronts us.


Reach Columnist Christian Patterson here; follow him here.


Live On Twitter


Craig Gillespie directed this true story about "the most daring rescue mission in the history of the U.S. Coast Guard.”

Watch USC Annenberg Media's live State of the Union recap and analysis here.



Steve (not verified) on November 24, 2012 7:12 PM

Both sides come together on immigration reform which will mean amnesty to 11 million poor, uneducated, people in this country illegally, mostly from Latin America, that include violent criminals and members of gangs and drug cartels. In 2016 whomever wins that election by getting the Hispanic vote will then allow another amnesty for eleven million or more of the same until the United States looks like a poor Third World country full of poverty like a Mexican border town. Why do our so-called representatives get by with doing what is best for their reelections than what is best for our country. They spend every waking moment raising money for their next reelection campaigns. I wish they would use their home phones doing it not running up the phone bill on taxpayers. My own home and cell phone bill is so full of taxes I have to pay, mostly for helping the poor people here illegally have a cell phone for themselves and all their children. We might as well fire all our border security and just put a welcome sign up at all our border crossings. After all we need more barbered wire and more graffiti, more green and yellow buildings and more shopping carts cafe's selling cotton candy and drugs. Don't we have enough people here already to clean toilets and mop floors? What we need is 11 million more professors, 11 million more doctors, 11 million more scientist not 11 million more janitors, but they won't allow but a small portion of those 11 million to be counted and allowed a green card. It is all about what is good for your representative in Washington to build his or her lifetime job to enjoy a lifestyle most Americans will ever know and without spending a dime of their own income, they spend yours while they bank or invest theirs and tell you how they understand your concerns.
I still wonder how 11 million illegals can afford to buy so much Budweiser when they can't pay their rent?

payday loans (not verified) on October 3, 2013 7:31 PM

John Chow is definitely my idol, i think that guy is extra-ordinary.
he is really talented.,

free criminal background check online (not verified) on October 3, 2013 8:33 AM

Spot lets start work on ths write-up, I really believe
this amazing site requirements much moire consideration.
I’ll apt to be once again to read a great deal more,
many thanks for thawt information.

คาสิโนออนไลน์ (not verified) on March 7, 2014 6:33 PM

Greetings! I know this is somewhat off topic but I was wondering which blog platform are
you using for this website? I'm getting fed up of Wordpress because I've had problems with hackers and I'm
looking at options for another platform. I would be awesome if you could point me in the direction of a good platform.

people finder (not verified) on September 20, 2013 9:47 PM

A powerful share, I merely given this onto a collewague whoo was doing slightly evaluation on this.
And he really purchased me breakfast as a result oof I found it for him..
smile. So let me reword that: Thnx for the deal with! On the other hand yeah Thnkx for
spending that the time too debate this, I feel strongly about it and love studying more on this topic.
If attainable, because yoou become experience,
would you mind updting your blog with exttra particulars?
It caan bbe extremely useful for me. Massive
thumb upp for this weblogg put up!

payday loans (not verified) on October 1, 2013 4:53 AM

I’ve been which way to publish about something like this particular on a single of our weblogs which features provided mme a thought.


reverse phone lookup (not verified) on September 24, 2013 5:39 PM

I must thank you for thhe efforts you have
made in publishing this weeb site post. I hope the the identical best article by yoou
later on also. Really your creative writing expertise has encouraged me to start out
my very own website now. Really that the blogging is spreeading it's wings speedily.
Your write up is actually a good model of

background check (not verified) on October 11, 2013 9:27 AM

saving your marriage should always bbe a priority whenever things turn sour on a marriage..

background check (not verified) on October 3, 2013 9:00 AM

Many people feel, mission coupled with dream fantastic produce legitimate

criminal background check (not verified) on October 3, 2013 12:27 AM

I’m impressed, I must say. Genuinely rarely will i emcounter a blog that’s bpth
educative and entertaining, and without a doubt, you’ve got hit the
nail for the head. Your idea is outstanding; the catch is an element that there are not enough everyone is speaking
intelligently about. I am happy which i found this within my hunt for some
thing about it.