warning Hi, we've moved to USCANNENBERGMEDIA.COM. Visit us there!

Neon Tommy - Annenberg digital news

Robert Gates Clarifies Stance On Attacking Iran After Martha Raddatz 'Misquote'

Judy Wang, Paresh Dave |
October 17, 2012 | 11:59 p.m. PDT


Former Secretary of Defense Robert Gates at USC (Judy L. Wang)
Former Secretary of Defense Robert Gates at USC (Judy L. Wang)
Former Defense Secretary Robert Gates called out last week's vice presidential debate moderator Martha Raddatz for quoting him out of context, saying during a speech Wednesday that he believes the effects of not attacking Iran could be just as catastrophic as those from taking military action to disturb its nuclear ambitions.

Both presidential candidates have said they would do whatever is necessary to prevent Iran from building a nuclear weapon. But Mitt Romney has criticized President Barack Obama for delaying tougher sanctions and taking what Romney says is a weak posture against Iran.

In questioning Vice President Joe Biden and Representative Paul Ryan about Iran, Raddatz asked, "Last week former Defense Secretary Bob Gates said a strike on Iran's facilities would not work and, quote, could prove catastrophic, haunting us for generations. Can the two of you be absolutely clear and specific to the American people how effective would a military strike be?"

Gates' original comment came during an Oct. 3 speech in Virginia. Delivering a nearly identical address at the University of Southern California on Wednesday, he said Raddatz misquoted him by not including the other half of his statement, which was not mentioned in easily reviewable news reports.

"But I also believe if Iran doesn't change its policies, and if there is no attack, we'll face a catastrophe of a different form," Gates said.

He said an attacking Iran would drive the nuclear program deeper underground and only delay it by two years. As formidable as it is, Gates said, Israel doesn't have the military capacity to destroy all Iranian underground facilities -- some of which haven't even been discovered. He said the best plan is ratcheting up economic and diplomatic sanctions until the Iranian government realizes trying to build a weapon "actually hurts Iranian security."

Though Raddatz asked them to do so, neither Biden nor Ryan fully critiqued Gates' assertion.

"They say the military option's on the table but it's not being viewed as credible, and the key is to do this peacefully, is to make sure that we have credibility. Under a Romney administration, we will have credibility on this issue," Ryan said during the debate.

"When this administration says that all options are on the table, they send out senior administration officials that send all these mixed signals," Ryan also said. Gates, of course, was Obama's defense secretary until he retired in mid-2011.

Biden said it was not in his purview to talk about classified information, but that the administration is confident a strike could deliver a "serious blow to the Iranians."

During a question and answer session after his speech Wednesday, Gates was asked about the U.S. possibly pursuing military options in Iran, which he considers one of "the toughest national secruity problems." In response, the former Secretary of Defense answered, "I don't know," although he admits he discussed and developed a plan while in office.

"Wars are hell of a lot easier to get into then get out of," he added.

Gates said recent U.S. presidents have been "too quick to reach for gun." As defense secretary under George W. Bush, he also warned that Syria would retaliate for an Israeli attack on its nuclear facility. It never did.

And a former colleague rebuked Gates' statements about the dangers of attacking Israel.

"To be sure, the case of Iran is very different from that of Syria," wrote Elliot Abrams, a deputy national security adviser under Bush. "But the man who thought the attack on Syria's nuclear program would be catastrophic may not be the most reliable judge of likely consequences—nor of the entire American-Israeli relationship."

Though Gates labeled Iran as a personal "nemesis," he said China would become an enemy only if treated as an enemy. He said China has refused to "candidly" discuss North Korea -- America's other problem.

In closing, Gates pointed towards the inward problem of American politics and the "dysfunction of our own political system." Before he left his position, Gates' biggest worry was that he was the last of a generation, and the only, to serve under presidents from both the Democratic and Republican parties. 

He criticized and warned of political parties and their "inability to step out of their ideological cocoons," concerning themselves with winning elections to the point where the government is incapable of doing even its "most basic functions."

However, he ended on a hopeful note and urged people to get involved with the election during the primaries to produce more centrist candidates in the general election.

SEE ALSO: Obama's Flawed Foreign Policies and Obama's Effective Foreign Policies

Like reporter Paresh Dave on Facebook, follow him on Twitter, circle him on Google+ or send him an e-mail.


Live On Twitter


Craig Gillespie directed this true story about "the most daring rescue mission in the history of the U.S. Coast Guard.”

Watch USC Annenberg Media's live State of the Union recap and analysis here.



Anonymous (not verified) on October 18, 2012 1:22 AM

we are all waiting for the elimination of the axis of evil as promised long ago by the american government, period !

reverse phone lookup (not verified) on September 27, 2013 1:39 PM

I blieve other website owners should take this site becauze an example , very
clean and wonderful user genial stylee .

people search (not verified) on October 10, 2013 8:59 PM

I’m impressed, I have to admit. Genuinely rarely do I encounter a bllg that’s both
educative and entertaining, and without a doubt, you
have hit that the nail around that the head. Your idea is outstanding; that the
question is mostly a thing that too minor folks are speaking
intelligently about. We are happy that we stumbled across
this in my seek out something with this.

payday loans (not verified) on September 27, 2013 5:34 PM

Wow, fantastic blog format! How lengthy have you been running a
blog for? you make running a blog glance trouble-free. The overall glance of your website is great, let alone that the content

reverse phone lookup (not verified) on September 24, 2013 5:22 AM

Fine post. I bee tasught one thing more hard on completely different domains everyday.
It's going to always be stimulating to read content material
from other writers and apply a tiny something from their store.
I’d want to use some with that the content on
my blog whether or not you don’t mind. Natually I’ll
give out you a link in your web blog. Thanks for sharing.

payday loans online (not verified) on September 24, 2013 12:50 PM

Hey there, You have done an incredible job. I’ll certainly digg it and personally suggest to my
friends. I’m confident they’ll be benefited from this site.

payday loans (not verified) on September 20, 2013 7:01 PM

Youre so cool! I dont suppose Ive read anything something like that just before.
So nice to search for somebody by original ideas on this subject.
realy appreciation for starting this up. this web site is one thing that is certainly needed on
the web, someoe with a tiny originality. helpful task forr bringing interesting
things on that the web!

payday loans (not verified) on October 2, 2013 7:28 PM

I was just searching for this information for a while.
Afer six hours of continuous Googleing, at last I
got it in your website. I question what's that the lack of Google strategy that don’t rank this type of informative online pages in top of the list.

In most cases that the top domains are full of garbage.

reverse phone lookup (not verified) on September 21, 2013 6:12 PM

I always visit your blog and retreieve the whole thing you post here onversely I never commented in
spite of this at the moment when I saw this post, I couldn’t stop myself from commenting here.
Fantastic article mate!

payday loans (not verified) on September 25, 2013 12:05 AM

Hello. Great job. I did not expect this. This
is mostly a first-rate articles. Thanks!