Neon Tommy - Annenberg digital news

White House Hints At Tapping Oil Reserve

Rosa Trieu |
February 24, 2012 | 5:14 p.m. PST

Executive Producer

 

The White House hinted tapping into oil reserves to lower gas prices. (Courtesy Creative Commons)
The White House hinted tapping into oil reserves to lower gas prices. (Courtesy Creative Commons)

As Americans continue to ride out the recession, the White House suggested Friday it may tap into the nation’s emergency reserve in an attempt to lower gas prices.

Gas prices have been soaring due to rising tensions between Iran and the West over disputes about its nuclear program. Gas prices jumped 12 cents a gallon just this week, bringing the national average to $3.65 a gallon. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner told CNBC that the United States is considering a release from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve while acknowledging supply disruptions from Iran could harm the global economy.

The Christian Science Monitor reported a spur of reaction from drivers in other countries:

It hasn’t helped that Europe and Russia are experiencing a harsh winter, driving up demand for home heating oil. More Asian nations, moreover, are beginning to reduce their consumption of Iranian crude oil to comply with a Western-led crackdown on firms that buy the oil. According to some press reports, India is reducing its purchases of Iranian crude by 10 percent, while some Chinese buyers are cutting back by 20 percent. Japan has indicated it will try to reduce its purchases by more than 10 percent.

These nations are now trying to round up replacement oil, plus stockpile more in case there is a conflict, says Mr. Flynn. “People are starting to hoard oil supplies to make sure they have supplies for whatever may be coming,” he says. “If we can avoid a confrontation with Iran, the market will collapse.”

The rising price of crude oil is rippling quickly through to the price of gasoline. On Friday, the national average price of a gallon of gasoline surged another 4 cents, to almost $3.65, according to AAA.

The Los Angeles Times reported democrats and liberal groups were the first to call on Obama to open the reserve:

Democrats and liberal groups were the first to call on Obama to open the reserve. In a letter to the president this week, three House Democrats asked Obama to take an "aggressive" approach.

"We must carefully consider all immediate options in order to prevent a runaway increase in prices," wrote Reps. Edward J. Markey of Massachusetts, Peter Welch of Vermont and Rosa DeLauro of Connecticut.

But analysts and Republicans are skeptical. The reserve was intended primarily as an emergency option to blunt the impact of a supply disruption. Today's high prices for crude oil are caused partly by concerns over the potential for disruptions and the looming sanctions on Iran.

If the U.S. acts preemptively, experts said, it could squander its reserve oil and end up with fewer options in the case of an actual supply interruption. Such a disruption would occur if Iran, for example, followed through on threats to close the Strait of Hormuz.

Republicans argue, as they traditionally do, that oil reserves should only be opened up if there is a major disruption in supply, not as a way to squelch concerns about rising gas prices.

 

 

 

 

Follow Executive Producer Rosa Trieu on Twitter.


 

Live On Twitter

Buzz

A Portentous Election

Greuel and Garcetti have been mum on the city’s biggest economic issue. 

 


Comments

kubs (not verified) on February 27, 2012 11:27 AM

Although we have had a mild winter there is still a large demand for home heating oil in the Northeast. Let's hope tensions in the middle east subside.

Your rating: None
kafantaris (not verified) on February 24, 2012 10:38 PM

Iran faces a delicate issue. On the one hand it wants to show the world all it’s got and put it at ease, while on the other hand it fears that such show 'n tell will give its enemies a roadmap to bomb it.
Saddam Hussein faced a similar dilemma ten years ago. Though he wanted the world to know he had nothing to hide, he also wanted to bluff his archenemy Iran into believing Iraq still had WMD.
Bluffing did not go well for Saddam, and it might not go well for Ahmadinejad.
But since the price tag for ridding Saddam proved high, maybe we ought to reflect what we are asking of Iran now. On the eve of a threatened attack, we are asking it to take us to the depths of its arsenal and show us all it's got.
Such great expectations are a sign we have been talking to our friends too long and are in need of a broader perspective. Exactly when was the last time we asked Pakistan, India, China or Russia to show us their arsenal?
“But those countries are not advocating the destruction of Israel.”
True, but Israel is not a thorn on their side either.
Surely, however, we can see beyond the hyperboles and figure out their underlying purpose. Or have we forgotten that not all Iranians are thrilled with Ahmadinejad?
He sure hasn’t.
Nor has he forgotten that that his countrymen hate Israel even more. So he tells them that Israel will be wiped from the face of the earth. Expectantly, this nonsense unites them against a common enemy. It is even a diversion from the misery and isolation brought on by his theocratic regime.
Quite clever work by Ahmadinejad -- and not a rial spent or a bullet fired.
So why are we letting the crazy talk about destroying Israel get us all worked-up -- to the point of turning the world topsy-turvy again.
Can we not see the desperate attempts of an unpopular regime simply trying to hold on?

Your rating: None

Leave a comment

Name
E-mail*
URL
Comments*