U.S., UK Urge Israel Not To Take Military Action Against Iran

“A strike at this time would be destabilizing and wouldn’t achieve their long-term objectives,” Army General Martin Dempsey, the chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, said of the Israelis to Businessweek. “I wouldn’t suggest, sitting here today, that we’ve persuaded them that our view is the correct view and that they are acting in an ill-advised fashion.”
The request comes shortly after Iran's Oil Ministry announced its suspension of oil shipments to Britain and France after the U.S. and European Union imposed sanctions on Iran's oil exports in January, hoping it would encourage Iran to halt its suspected nuclear program. The U.S., EU and Israel have all suspected Iran of developing nuclear weapons though Tehran denies the allegations.
FOX reported that Israel accepted the oil sanctions but that its patience with Iran is starting to run out.
According to Bloomberg News:
- Officials in Tel Aviv have tried to alert the West to the dangers of a nuclear Iran for more than a decade. They argued that Iran would cause the technology to proliferate in the region as states such as Turkey, Egypt and Saudi Arabia sought such weapons, turning a multipolar nuclear Middle East into a strategic nightmare. A nuclear-armed Iran would strengthen its hegemony in the energy sector by its mere location along the oil-rich Arabian Gulf and the Caspian Basin.
- It would also result in the West’s loss of the Central Asian states, which would either gravitate toward Iran or try to secure a nuclear umbrella with Russia or China, countries much closer to the region than the U.S. is. A regime in Tehran emboldened by the possession of nuclear weapons would become more active in supporting radical Shiite elements in Iraq and agitating those communities in the Arabian Gulf states.
Meanwhile, officials from the International Atomic Energy Agency arrived in Iran Saturday to discuss its nuclear activity. This is their second visit this month.
“This meeting is a crucial opportunity for everyone, including the Iranians, to get serious,” Arms Control Association Director Daryl Kimball said from Vienna in a telephone interview with Businessweek. “Getting serious means focusing on the near-term problem that 20 percent enriched uranium represents” which drives the “hysterical war talk in some quarters.”
Iran has been secretative about its nuclear program for nearly two decades and claims it wants nuclear power "for peaceful purposes," reported Businessweek.



Comments
Iran faces a delicate issue. On the one hand it wants to show the world all its got and put it at ease, while on the other hand it fears that such show 'n tell will give its enemies a road map to bomb it.
Saddam Hussein faced a similar dilemma ten years ago. Though he wanted the world to know he had nothing to hide, he also wanted to bluff his archenemy Iran into believing that Iraq still had WMD.
Bluffing did not go well for Saddam, and it might not go well for Amadijan.
But since the price tag for ridding Saddam proved so high, maybe we ought to reflect what we are asking of Iran now. On the eve of a threat to attack it, we are asking it to take us to the depths of its arsenal and show us all it's got.
Such great expectations are a sign we have been talking to our friends too long and are in need of a broader perspective.
Exactly when was the last time we asked Pakistan, India, China or Russia to show us their arsenal?
“But those countries are not advocating the destruction of Israel,” you say.
True, but Israel is not a thorn on their side either.
Surely, however, we can see beyond Iran's hyperboles and figure out their underlying purpose. Or have we forgotten that not all Iranians are thrilled with Amadijan?
He sure has not forgotten that he is not loved in Iran.
Nor has he forgotten that that his countrymen hate Israel even more. So he tells them that Israel will be wiped from the face of the earth.
Expectantly, this nonsense unites them against a common enemy. It even becomes a diversion from the misery and isolation brought on by the theocratic regime.
Quite Clever work by Amadijan -- and not a rial spent or a bullet fired.
So why are we letting this crazy talk about destroying Israel get us all worked-up -- and to the point of turning the world topsy-turvy again.
Can we not see the desperate attempts of an unpopular regime simply trying to hold on to power?