One federal law that has not been blocked or held for a court ruling by the Supreme justices in the April session is that any of the 50 states can enforce E-Verify. In Arizona "The Legal Arizona Workers Act" (SB1070) requires all employers in the state of Arizona to verify their employee’s immigration status through a voluntary federal Electronic Employment Verification System, known as “E-Verify.” This encompasses all 50 states that they can either comply voluntary as a few strong, hard willed legislators have introduced. While the larger majority of relaxed states that have completely ignored E-Verify program and just done absolutely nothing? Many state lawmakers are just not interested in enforcing laws, which would send illegal aliens packing, once they are unable to get hired?

But it will be 'poetic justice' that those foreign nationals scrambling to leave the few states trying to protect their legal population must find another refuge? They have a wide range of other States to head for, so they can gain work with some innocent victims stolen Social Security card. Additionally the families, who have several children smuggled into America before birth, can then apply for a range of public assistance including food stamps- as the law at the present time says they are U.S. citizens. A foreign illegal mother can deprive a legal family of low cost housing, as she is now pregnant again with her third or fourth child. With this many children and entitlements of cash payments, the whole family can live on this welfare assistance, then making room in the Section 8 housing for others who have sneaked across the porous border, or tricked the agent at the airport they are a tourist.

Judge Wake's ruling On February 7, 2008, that Alabama decision to mandate that all business owners in the state use E-Verify ruling it's not in conflict preempted, because Congress did not clearly prohibit States from making E-Verify mandatory when they made involvement voluntary. Then in September 28, 2011, Alabama Judge Sharon Lovelace upheld most of Alabama's new immigration enforcement law, H.B. 56, including e-Verify that doesn't forestall the 1986 Immigration Reform & Control Act (IRCA.) Judge Wakes ruling has been has been appealed on several more occasions, but essentially to been struck down, allowing the state of Alabama to implement E-Verify. Then federal judge Thomas Thrash in the state of Georgia, granted a request to block parts of Georgia's law cracking down on illegal immigration from taking effect until a legal challenge is resolved, but as anticipated in (H.B.87) most of its legal construction remains intact, including E-verify requirements on employers.

Other then Arizona, Alabama, Georgia, Utah, Indiana, South Carolina, the circuit of less restrictive states of California, Nevada, Montana, North Dakota, Wyoming, Iowa, Wisconsin, Kansas, New Mexico, Texas, Arkansas, Kentucky, Ohio, West Virginia, Maryland, Delaware, New Jersey, Connecticut, Rhode Island, Massachusetts and New Hampshire have no E-Verify laws, that would benefit the unemployed in each individual region of the United States.

Voters must convince their politicians, governors, mayors and all top officials that we need federal mandatory E-Verify to insure citizens and legal residents are protected in their jobs, from the illegal alien invaders. This law THE LEGAL WORKFORCE ACT” (H.R.2885) will force Employers to face serious penalties, fines, and even jail if they knowingly hire someone who is not lawfully authorized to work according to the information obtained through the E-Verify database. Not so well know or Publicized is an amendment to the 14th Amendment, to amend the law that says every baby born in the United States is granted citizenship. This is a misinterpretation of the law and citizenship should only be given where either parent already has citizenship status. The “Birthright Citizenship” (H.R.140) Bill that needs every voters attention, as it is singularly the most expensive benefit, that citizens are forced to pay in unfunded mandates. It is concealed that support for illegal aliens cost over $113 billion dollars a year by government and Liberal press editors. If you really want the facts about the illegal alien incursions and many other problem that cause Americans unnecessary pain and suffering, then you need to view the uncensored pages, not suppressed by the Leftist media at (Google) AMERICAN PATROL. For information about the dishonesty in Washington and state congressional seats of power, check the web pages of the (Google) JUDICIAL WATCH.

Although mandatory E-Verify is not as famous according to which side of the aisle in Congress, it is significant that the word is spreading about the powerful application, specifically when the Census Bureau admits that around 8 million plus are working illegally in this country. Every American is supposed to think jobs are the only incentive that drives foreigners, across our sovereign borders, but easy access to taxpayer benefits as well. Annually there has been huge fraudulent child tax credit reimbursement and also a sudden rising crime rate, including unceasing drunken driving ending in death. For all intents and purposes, President Obama has frozen immigration enforcement and through his orders allowing many foreigners to stay here.

Every American voter has a chance to fight against unfair taxation, which through judicial unfunded mandates is placed firmly in the taxpayers lap. In this session of Congress or before the 2012 election, it is urgent you concentrate in phoning or otherwise contacting Democrat, Republican Senators and House Congressmen at 202-224-3121 to inform them strongly you want both nationwide E-Verify and the citizenship bill passed. Unless these laws are enacted, then under another five years of President Obama we could see another amnesty; deceiving us as comprehensive Immigration reform. The last Amnesty was heavily weighted down with fraudulent applications, so a new move to giving 20 million plus illegal aliens a path to citizenship is hardly going to be any different?

Besides, it isn't the day laborer who is blocking the traffic. It's the "citizen", the person who stops-- the citizen--who is blocking the cars behind him/her. Law enforcement would need to show the State's actions are in good faith. In other words, they'd have to apprehend the people who stop to listen to the workers expressing their desire to work. That pesky Constitution again.